September 2009

Evaluation research helps local health departments make informed decisions

Evaluation Services staff was called upon by the Western and South Central Incubator Partnerships to evaluate two environmental health data management systems: Custom Data Processing (CDP), designed by a  private vendor, and Best Environmental Technology System (BETS), recently developed by the state Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The two systems are used by most  local health departments in North Carolina

Data was collected from over 300 local users of both systems by Molly Cannon, MPH, and other Institute evaluation staff.  Of CDP users, 61% reported collecting electronic data in the field, compared to 12% of BETS users. Barriers to electronic data collection included the bulkiness of the laptops, concern about damaging the equipment, and technical difficulties with the system.

The greatest benefits of the systems included improving readability of reports, enhancing reporting capabilities, and improving accuracy. The greatest challenges included technical problems such as system crashes and data management issues.

View the complete evaluation report at:
http://www.publichealthincubators.com/ CDP_BETS_Eval.pdf

Cannon and Institute evaluation services conducted another data collection and analysis for another incubator collaborative, the Northeast North Carolina Partnership for Public Health, to determine the costs and benefits of participating in the Partnership.

The evaluation asked about the costs and benefits to each Partnership agency, and wheter the percent of in-kind contribution is reasonable compared to benefits.

All 10 health directors in the Partnership and between two to six staff from each agency responded to the surveys. Cost categories included health director time, agency staff time, and Partnership dues. Benefit categories included fiscal agent overhead and administrative costs and project costs associated with eight Partnership projects: LEAN, Diabetes Sentinel, Touch No Tobacco, HIV – Health in Motion, Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Health Disparities, GIS, and Common Billing Initiative.

For all 10 agencies, the dollar benefits calculated were greater than the dollar costs; the median cost benefit ratio was 6.65. The greatest in-kind costs for health directors are related to their administrative roles in the partnership (participating in strategic planning and board meetings) and the specific roles related to being on the executive committee or a fiduciary agent. The greatest in-kind costs for staff are participation in the project activities.

For more information about these research projects, contact Molly Cannon at mcannon@email.unc.edu.

<<--Back


Research explores why residents don't evacuate for hurricanes

On September 18, 2003, Hurricane Isabel made landfall as a Category 2 storm between Ocracoke Island, NC, and Cape Lookout, NC. The storm entered the Albemarle Sound where strong winds of up to 105 miles per hour and storm surge of four to six feet caused extensive flooding and downed trees and power lines. One death and over $450 million in property damage were directly attributed to Hurricane Isabel.

Five years later, Jennifer Horney with the North Carolina Center for Public Health Preparedness, was in the Albemarle Sound region where she conducted in-person interviews with nearly 600 individuals who had weathered the impacts of Hurricane Isabel back in 2003. For her dissertation in the Department of Epidemiology at the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, she sought to prove that social reasons related to friends, family, and social activities are important factors in determining why people choose not to evacuate from a potentially dangerous hurricane.

After completing interviews in 2008, Dr. Horney found that high levels of neighborhood social cohesion, markers of territoriality (e.g., no trespassing signs), membership in church or civic organizations, neighbors’ evacuation, and longer length of residence were associated with a higher risk of failing to evacuate from Hurricane Isabel. While attending more church or organizational meetings did not increase the likelihood of evacuation failure, volunteering to provide assistance following Hurricane Isabel did. Of all the demographic and storm-related variables on which Dr. Horney collected data, only homeownership, housing type, age, and having an evacuation plan were as important with regard to evacuation decision making as these social factors.

Based on these findings, Dr. Horney hopes to work with local agencies to determine if it is possible for public health and emergency management officials to develop targeted messages and interventions that can take advantage of strong neighborhood ties, civic engagement, and peer influences to encourage protective behaviors such as evacuation from impending hurricanes.

 

 


Research weighs impact between accreditation and performance

A research study by Institute Deputy Director Dorothy Cilenti compared accredited and non-accredited local public health agency performance. Eighty local health agencies in North Carolina were part of the study that focused on three areas--policy development and implementation, community engagement, and leadership behavior.

Data from surveys, interviews, focus groups, time-series comparisons, and from the NC Center for Health Statistics was used to complete the picture of how local public health agency accreditation impacts public health performance.

Says Cilenti, “Overall, accredited health departments had higher scores in two of three categories. These findings may provide valuable information to North Carolina public health leaders and the national voluntary accreditation efforts regarding ways to ensure that local public health agency accreditation drives high performance.”

Results were presented in July 2009 to the state accreditation board with various recommendations including more emphasis on leadership development, greater focus on community partnerships, and the need for more communication with elected officials and the general public about the benefits of accreditation.

 

<--Back


Measuring leadership institute's impact

In 2008, the Southeast Public Health Leadership Institute (SEPHLI) asked NCIPH evaluation staff to assess the program’s long-term influence on its graduates. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, Karl Umble, PhD, MPH, and Chloe Katz, MPH (c), documented the actions graduates have taken since graduation and their results.

SEPHLI is a year-long leadership development program for administrators in public health organizations in North and South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, and Arkansas. It is offered by the North Carolina Institute for Public Health and sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as well as by participating states.

Umble and Katz found that the program has developed the capabilities of leaders, strengthened their influence, and encouraged them to lead within their respective states on personal, organizational, community and policy levels.

Graduates reported improved skills, increased confidence and knowledge, broadened perspectives, and a renewed commitment to public health. They also reported networking with other scholars in their cohorts and stronger collaborations with other public health officials in their communities and states.

SEPHLI alumni also explained how they were using their new skills and insights to strengthen programs, organizations, system, and policies.

Here is one graduate's story.

In 2007, Debra Harris-Hawkins, MHA, a 2007 SEPHLI scholar, led a mobile mammography screening community outreach event for underserved and rural populations in Harnett County. The event was the product of a unique initiative called The Mammography Outreach Program, or MOP. MOP is designed to educate women about the importance of early detection through both education and mammography screenings, and is the result of Debra Harris-Hawkins' SEPHLI leadership project. MOP facilitates an innovative partnership between the Harnett County Department of Public Health, Harnett County Human Resources, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Western Medical Group, and Rex Healthcare’s Mobile Mammography.

Harris-Hawkins recently reported, "I am pleased to share that this program is still operational. I have been fortunate enough to pursue and secure funding from the Susan G. Komen Foundation for the past two years to support screenings and education for uninsured women."

The Susan G. Komen for the Cure NC Triangle Affiliate awarded the Harnett County Department of Public Health approximately $29,000, which supports working to eliminate barriers that prevent women from obtaining screenings.

Says Harris-Hawkins, "SEPHLI was a wonderful program and experience!"

To learn more about MOP, contact Debra Harris-Hawkins at dhawkins@harnett.org.

Click here for the full SEPHLI evaluation report.

 

 

<--Back


What incentives will encourage health department accreditation?

While accreditation of local health departments in North Carolina has been going on since 2004, accreditation of state and local health departments nationwide is just being pilot-tested, and one of the key questions has been incentives. NCIPH researchers Mary Davis, DrPH, Margaret Cannon, MPH, and Edward Baker, MD, MPH, addressed that question in "Incentives to Encourage Participation in the National Public Health Accreditation Model: A Systematic Investigation", to be published in the American Journal of Public Health in September, 2009. Liza Corso, MPA, and Dennis Lenaway, PhD, MPH, both from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, also coauthored the article.

With a 50% survey response rate, the research indicates that financial incentives to prepare for accreditation and to support infrastructure and quality improvement would be most likely to encourage participation in the process.

Over 2500 surveys and interviews among state and local health department representatives also measured the perceived effect of other incentives--streamlining the grant application process, technical assistance to prepare for accreditation, and national and local recognition. An earlier accreditation assessment included quality and performance improvement, consistency among health departments, and recognition by peers as important incentives. 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Network of Public Health Institutes supported the research.

<<--Back


From the director

We will be celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Institute on October 9 on campus in Rosenau Hall at the Gillings School of Global Public Health. We will be reviewing our accomplishments, outlining our future, and, most importantly, recognizing our outstanding staff and partners.

Joining us to share their visions for the Institute as the School's "Service and Outreach Arm" will be Dean Barbara Rimer of the Gillings School of Global Public Health, and Institute founders Bill Friday and Bill Roper. Because we exist to serve the practice community across the state, we are thrilled that we will also be joined by Jeff Engel, Leah Devlin, Phred Pilkington, and Sen. Fletcher Hartsell. We will also be hearing from leaders beyond our state who have been key Institute partners and beneficiaries.

The Institute has much of which to be proud. We have trained and educated public health professionals to conduct environmental health inspections, thereby protecting the health of North Carolinians. We have trained public health nurses to provide care for underserved mothers and children, thereby protecting the health of the youngest and most vulnerable. We have helped frontline public health workers detect epidemics, such as H1N1 influenza, thereby strengthening health surveillance systems.

Our public health leadership and management development programs are nationally-recognized and constitute a model which we are helping to replicate outside the United States. Our two distance-based certificate education programs directly benefit North Carolina's public health professionals as well as professionals across the nation and around the world.

The Institute is a national leader in public health preparedness, prevention of childhood obesity, and the public health quality movement, which encompasses local public health agency accreditation. Furthermore, we are becoming a national leader in public health systems and services research, with a focus on preparedness and accreditation systems research.

In all of these programs, we are committed to serving those who serve the public's health. As the largest practice unit in any of the nation's schools of public health, the North Carolina Institute for Public Health carries on UNC’s proud tradition of serving the public health practice community. We are widely recognized as the best academically-based public health practice unit in the nation and we are committed to remaining so.

Despite these impressive accomplishments, the current recession has resulted in unprecedented budget cuts which will limit our capacity in the months ahead. This will cause us to reevaluate priorities, redesign programs, and reconnect with our partners. We intend to emerge as a stronger organization with a recommitment to serving the public health practice community. We invite you to join us as we move into the Institute's second decade of leadership, innovation and impact.

Edward L. Baker, MD, MPH
Director, North Carolina Institute for Public Health
Professor, Health Policy and Epidemiology
UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health

<<--Back


Trial by water
A look back at Hurricane Floyd September, 1999

One month after the new North Carolina Institute for Public Health was named, Hurricane Floyd pounded into eastern North Carolina with 20 inches of rain and 15 foot storm surges. Just weeks prior, Hurricane Dennis had dumped 15 inches of rain on southeastern North Carolina, making area rivers exceed 500-year flood levels.

Flooding and strong winds affected many homes across the state, destroying 7,000, leaving 17,000 uninhabitable, and damaging 56,000 more. Ten thousand people resided in temporary shelters following the storm. Because that part of the state houses numerous livestock farms, environmental contamination by animal waste and dead animals was a major health concern.

The Institute was asked to coordinate the UNC School of Public Health response to come to the aid of state emergency health services and to the communities of eastern North Carolina.

"What we did ranged from muddy clean-up to drinking water testing, manning hotlines, encouraging donations, organizing nurses and social workers for the shelters, and even going door-to-door to find out what people needed," said Dr. Rachel Stevens, then deputy director of NCIPH. "It was a huge first test of our organization and its response."

The Institute hosted a videoconference with emergency procedure experts from the Division of Public Health and later distributed tapes and transcripts of the telecast. The booklet and a condensed flyer were printed in both Spanish and English and distributed in affected areas.

The lessons learned from Floyd in Pitt County was the subject of a January, 2000 Public Health Grand Rounds, produced by the Institute, entitled Disasters, People and Public Health: Are you ready?
 
"We worked with faculty and students in every department in the School, the Schools of Medicine, Nursing, and Social Work, Area L AHEC, and the Carolina Center for Public Service," added Stevens. "It was quite a collaborative effort."

There were 35 deaths in the state attributed to Hurricane Floyd. Said then North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services H. David Bruton, "Nothing since the Civil War has been as destructive to families here."

NOTE:   Each month the Institute has been featuring a Year 10 vignette on its website to help commemorate our 10th anniversary.  Read the archive here.

 

<<--Back


 

New toolkit assists local health departments in planning for at-risk groups

How does a local health department help the elderly, the disabled, and other vulnerable groups during an emergency? The on-line toolkit, Emergency Planning for At-Risk Groups, provides guidance to planners for identifying, engaging, communicating with, and providing services to at-risk populations during public health emergencies, such as pandemic influenza.

Developed by the North Carolina Center for Public Health Preparedness (NCCPHP) in partnership with the Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response at the North Carolina Division of Public Health, the toolkit covers the five areas of preparedness for at-risk populations developed by the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.

Each topic area includes stories of local initiatives that have strengthened disaster preparedness and response for at-risk populations. A total of 11 stories from communities around North Carolina are featured, with audio clips of key contacts who describe the activity and how it was implemented. Each topic area also includes topic spotlights (which provide in-depth analysis of key issues relevant to local planners interested in at-risk population planning), resources, and suggested planning activities. The toolkit also includes ready-to-use PowerPoint templates that may be customized for presentations to at-risk groups or partner organizations in the community to obtain support for planning activities.

While primarily designed for local health departments, and with an emphasis on North Carolina, planners at other emergency response agencies and organizations may also find these materials useful. The toolkit is available online at
nccphp.sph.unc.edu/at-riskplanning
. For additional information about the toolkit, contact NCCPHP Research Associate Richard Rosselli at richross@email.unc.edu.

 

<<--Back


2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak update

The North Carolina Center for Public Health Preparedness (NCCPHP) continues its work in responding to the 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak. This fall, NCCPHP will partner with the North Carolina Division of Public Health (NC DPH) on several projects designed to better prepare state and local agencies for the upcoming influenza season.  One such project is a community survey of public acceptability and intention to receive the new H1N1 vaccine.  Results from this survey may help inform and improve any proposed H1N1 vaccination campaign. 

NCCPHP will also provide technical assistance to local health departments in revising their pandemic influenza plans in light of changes due to H1N1. NCCPHP worked with NC DPH and local health departments in 2006-2007 when these plans were first developed. In addition, the Institute will work with NC DPH to anticipate and address legal concerns of volunteers assisting in H1N1 activities.

NCCPHP continues to offer a number of online trainings related to influenza on the NCCPHP Training Web Site. Check the NCCPHP Web site for updates on these and other NCCPHP pandemic influenza projects.

 

 

<<--Back


Field Epidemiology Certificate honors its 100th graduate

The online Certificate in Field Epidemiology celebrated its 100th graduate at a ceremony at the Carolina Club in August 2009.

Started in 2005, the Certificate in Field Epidemiology was designed to meet the educational needs of public health practitioners working in the area of epidemiology. Recent outbreaks and emerging health threats have only increased the need for a prepared workforce. This twelve credit hour program consists of four courses: Principles in Epidemiology, Methods in Epidemiology, Fundamentals of Public Health Surveillance and Applied Infectious Disease Epidemiology.

Not only do students benefit from online discussions with their classmates, but they incorporate the coursework into their current jobs. Participant Shawn Johnson says, “I used the course information and strategies while investigating two norovirus outbreaks in our community. I was able to develop linelists, epicurves, and write up a scientific report for the outbreaks. I would recommend the course to any professionals working in local health departments."

While some students choose the Certificate to enhance their careers, many others view the Certificate as a preparation for degree program. Jerry Rhodes commented, "I love the program and am very glad to have completed it. I hope to continue on in the MPH program in the future and feel like I have a good grounding in public health that will aid me in the masters program.” Approximately 25% of the certificate graduates have continued their education at UNC in a degree program at the Gillings School of Global Public Health.

Find out more about enrolling at the Certificate in Field Epidemiology website.

 

<<--Back


SPHTC takes the lead in the development of entry level core public health competencies

Crafting entry level public health core competencies is a new undertaking of the Southeast Public Health Training Center. SPHTC Director Janet Place is leading a national committee made up of representatives from other public health training centers, other academics, and practitioners to draft the Tier 1 Core Competencies. The work is being facilitated by the Council on Linkages (COL) of the Public Health Foundation.

In 2001, the COL developed the national Tier 2 Core Public Health Competencies, which have been widely used to assess skills and develop public health practitioner education and training. The COL recently modified the Tier 2 competencies to more accurately reflect the expected skills of those with an MPH and five years career experience. Place served on the Tier 2 Committee.

But only 20 percent of the traditional public health workforce has any formal public health education, and it is problematic to use the MPH level competencies to assess the skills of those without MPHs. In addition, the Tier 2 competencies include skills that an entry level public health worker would not use, particularly those involving policy development, management, and leadership.
                      
The Tier 1 Core Competency Committee will soon finish the draft entry-level competencies. They will then go to the COL for review and then out for public comment. A draft of the new competencies will be available at the American Public Health Association conference in November. Place is using this initiative as her leadership project for the Southeast Public Health Leadership Institute. For more information, contact jplace@email.unc.edu

<<--Back


News from the Public/Private Legal Preparedness Initiative:

Six states pass entity emergency liability protection in 2009

During the first six months of 2009, six state legislatures have passed laws that provide liability protection for businesses and non-profit entities that assist their governments during emergencies (Arkansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Virginia).

These states join five previous states that revised their entity liability protection provisions in the 2007 and 2008 legislative sessions (Georgia, Iowa, North Carolina, Utah, and Washington).

A total of 28 state jurisdictions (including the District of Columbia) have now developed entity emergency liability protection. In addition to the eleven states listed above, 15 states have determined that entity liability protection is provided under the terms of their existing law. (Alabama, Delaware, District of Columbia, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin). The states of Florida and South Carolina have administrative arrangements in place to provide liability protection to business and non-profit organizations. 

Given the prospect of an increase in the spread of a novel H1N1 virus this winter, it is timely that significant progress has been made to encourage voluntary public/private cooperation in emergency situations.

The Institute’s Public/Private Legal Preparedness Initiative is designed to improve emergency preparedness and response by removing the legal barriers that hinder effective and timely collaboration between the private, nonprofit, and public sectors. 

Most state laws do not extend Good Samaritan liability protection to businesses and non-profit entities that assist communities in preparing for and responding to public health emergencies.

Visit the Public/Private Legal Preparedness Initiative Website.

 

<<--Back


 

Institute presenters at the American Public Health Association conference in November

Accreditation and Public Health Preparedness
John B. Wayne, Glen Mays, Mary Davis, DrPH James Bellamy, Cammie Marti, Rachel Willard, Edward Baker, MD, MPH
(Oral - Monday 11/ 9, 2009, 1:10 pm)

Traveling down the pathway of competency-based online trainings: Helping learners navigate to meet targeted training needs
Lorraine K. Alexander, DrPH, MPH, Rachel A. Wilfert, MD, MPH, and Kristen B. Van Dole, MSPH
(Poster - Monday 11/9 2:30 pm)

Enhancing interaction in a graduate-level online certificate program in field epidemiology using wikis, blogs, and Web conferencing
Lorraine K. Alexander, DrPH, MPH, Debra E. Irwin, PhD, MSPH, Amy Nelson, PhD, MPH, CPH, and Karin B. Yeatts, PhD
(Poster - Monday 11/9 2:30 pm)

Developing an online course for international public health practitioners using Lectora
Laura Alexander, BA, Amy Nelson, PhD, MPH, CPH, Jennifer Michalove, MPH, Joshua Mott, PhD, and Jennifer A. Horney, PhD, MPH, CPH
(Oral - Monday 11/9 2:30 pm)

Applying the incident command system to public health: Developing a self-guided training for local health departments on using incident command with outbreak investigations
Carol Gunther-Mohr, MA, Martha J. Salyers, MD, MPH, Meredith K. Davis, MPH, Laura Alexander, BA, and Rachel A. Wilfert, MD, MPH
(Oral - Monday 11/9 10:30 am)

Moving to electronic disease surveillance: Lessons learned from a trainer's perspective in designing and delivering a comprehensive statewide training program for local health departments
Lauren M. DiBiase, MS, Amy B. Sloane, BA, Meredith K. Davis, MPH, Lauren N. Bradley, MHS, Michael E. Scott, BS, and Rachel A. Wilfert, MD, MPH
(Oral - Tuesday 11/10 10:30 am)

Effects of Interdisciplinary Training on MCH Professionals, Organizations and Systems
Lewis H. Margolis, MD, Angela Rosenberg, Karl Umble, PhD, MPH, Linda Chewning, Jan Dodds , Michael Milano, Mary Nyan, and Kathleen Rounds
(Poster - Tuesday 11/10, 4:30 pm)

Lessons learned: Training and implementation of an electronic surveillance system in North Carolina
Lauren M. DiBiase, MS, Amy B. Sloane, BA, Allison M. Connolly, MA, MPH, and Rachel A. Wilfert, MD, MPH
(Poster - Wednesday 11/11 8:30 am)

Impact of North Carolina local public health agency accreditation on public health performance
Dorothy Cilenti, DrPH, MPH, MSW
(Panel – Wednesday, 11/11 12:30 pm)

Visit www.apha.org for more information about the conference.

 

<<--Back

 

footer